Prevention of Infection in Kidney Patients

Renal patients are particularly vulnerable to infection in part because they are relatively, or significantly, immunocompromised, undergo numerous invasive procedures and typically have frequent contact with healthcare institutions putting them at much higher risk of nosocomial infections. In addition, they are typically exposed to multiple antibiotics, which may select out resistant organisms or damage protective microbiomes. The Covid-19 pandemic has brought the life and death importance of infection control to every renal unit and forced a, perhaps overdue, appreciation of the issues and responsibilities associated with nosocomial infections. In addition, our patients are disproportionately impacted by the growing emergence of antimicrobial resistance. This chapter reviews the key aspects of nosocomial infections in renal patients and the important elements of infection control and antibiotic stewardship that can protect our patients. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2014, 2022.

Impact of improving infection control and antibiotic stewardship practices on nosocomial infections and antimicrobial resistance in an oncology centre from India

Background: Improving basic infection control (IC) practices, diagnostics and anti-microbial stewardship (AMS) are key tools to handle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective study done over 6 years (2016-2021) in an oncology centre in North India with many on-going interventions to improve IC practices, diagnostics and AMS. This study looked into AMR patterns from clinical isolates, rates of hospital acquired infections (HAI) and clinical outcomes. Result(s): Over all, 98,915 samples were sent for culture from 158,191 admitted patients. Most commonly isolated organism was E. coli (n = 6951;30.1%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5801;25.1%) and Pseudomonas aeroginosa (n = 3041;13.1%). VRE (Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus) rates fell down from 43.5% in Jan-June 2016 to 12.2% in July-Dec 2021, same was seen in CR (carbapenem resistant) Pseudomonas (23.0%-20.6%, CR Acinetobacter (66.6%-17.02%) and CR E. coli (21.6%-19.4%) over the same study period. Rate of isolation of Candida spp. from non-sterile sites also showed reduction (1.68 per 100 patients to 0.65 per 100 patients). Incidence of health care associated infections also fell from 2.3 to 1.19 per 1000 line days for CLABSI, 2.28 to 1.88 per 1000 catheter days for CAUTI. There was no change in overall mortality rates across the study period. Conclusion(s): This study emphasizes the point that improving compliance to standard IC recommendations and improving diagnostics can help in reducing the burden of antimicrobial resistance.Copyright © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists

A Case Series of Kodamaea Ohmeri Infection: The Hidden Threat Unleashed

Intro: Kodamaea ohmeri, previously known as Pichia ohmeri, is an ascomycetous yeast that has emerged as an important cause of fungemia in immunocompromised patients. During the anamorphic stage this organism is also known as Candida guillermondii var. membranaefaciens. Method(s): We report five cases of Kodamaea ohmeri encountered from multicenter in Malaysia. Antifungal agent of choice will be discussed based on literature review. Finding(s): The cases were: (1) a contaminated peritoneal fluid in an adult patient on peritoneal dialysis;(2) a 60-year-old man with infected diabetic foot isolated K. ohmeri from a bone sample. Both cases discharged well without active antifungal fungal therapy. We observed fatality cases involving (3) an old man with underlying gastric adenocarcinoma who complicated with catheter- related bloodstream infection caused by K. ohmeri;(4) a patient with ventilator- associated pneumonia and septicaemic shock secondary to perforated terminal ileum;(5) and a severely ill COVID-19 stage 5b patient who passed away due to systemic fungaemia caused by K. ohmeri. Discussion(s): All three fatal cases received either amphotericin B or caspofungin as active antifungal agent. Literature evidence has shown that 40% of patient met demise despite on active antifungal agent, suggesting that currently no definitive antifungal agent proven to be a superior treatment option for K. ohmeri infection. Removal of indwelling medical device combined with antifungal therapy has favorable clinical outcome. Conclusion(s): Therefore, K. ohmeri infection in severely ill patients should be considered as a critical condition. Potential of alternative antifungal combinations need to be explored for an effective treatment option.Copyright © 2023

Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Epidemiology of Infections in Pre- and Post-Covid-19 Pandemic a Single Centre Study

Introduction: Infections are the leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at all time intervals. The non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) taken during the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced almost all kinds of infections in the general population, as shown in the Chunmei Su et al. study. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of NPIs for the COVID-19 pandemic on infections in KTR patients. Method(s): This was a single-center retrospective observational study conducted at Mumbai's Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre.Samples from symptomatic KTR patients were taken and those who had positive cultures were thought to be infected. The data were analysed and compared between the years 2021 (during the COVID-19 pandemic) and 2019 (before the COVID-19 pandemic). Result(s): A total of 224 patients were enrolled, including 117 patients in 2019 and 107 patients in 2021. In 2019 and 2021, the prevalence of nosocomial infection and community-acquired infection in KTR patients remains unchanged.In 2021, both the number of protective gloves and level 2 PPE kits used per individual, as well as the number of healthcare professionals per patient, have increased dramatically. Regarding the source of infections, no significant change in major infections was observed in respiratory tract infections (12% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.8985), gastrointestinal infections (1.8% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.0786), catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI) (4.5% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.776), and blood stream infections (11.7% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.73), However, there were increases in urinary tract infections (23% vs. 42.1%;p = 0.0006). The microorganism analysis of respiratory infections shows declines in nocardia and tuberculosis. Gastrointestinal infections show increased Clostridium difficile cases in 2021 compared to 2019, which can be attributed to the overuse of antibiotics. Regarding urinary tract infection, a decline in mixed infection cases and an increase in Enterobacter faecalis and Enterobacter cloacae cases were observed. There were no significant variations in catheter-related nosocomial infections between 2019 and 2021. In comparison to an older study done in the general population by Chunmei Su et al, our study shows no significant change in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and catheter-related blood infections in 2021 compared to 2019 in KTR, despite restrictions being relaxed in general populations beginning in June 2020.Also, there was no significant increase in community acquired pneumonia in 2021, even after reopening public places. Conclusion(s): Our institutional NPIs for KTR patients in the pre-COVID-19 era were shown to be as effective as NPIs for the COVID-19 pandemic in reducing the prevalence of common infections like respiratory, gastrointestinal, blood stream, and catheter-related infections in KTR patients. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

Protein Energy Wasting and Clinical Outcomes of Children with Ckd2-5d- a Prospective Longitudinal Study

Introduction: Protein energy wasting (PEW) is an established entity in adults with CKD but is not well studied in children. The burden of PEW has been observed to be higher in Indian children with CKD compared to the chronic kidney disease in children (CKiD) cohort. The impact of PEW on outcomes needs to be addressed in these children with CKD. This prospective longitudinal study was undertaken in children with CKD 2-5D to assess the association of PEW with clinical outcomes of infection related hospital admissions (IRHA). Method(s): Children (age 2-18 years) with CKD 2-5D, from a tertiary care center were recruited for PEW assessment from January 2017 following ethical committee approval and informed consent. Children with evidence of infection in the last month and those on dialysis for less than a month were excluded. Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of hospital admissions were recorded till June 2022. Based on the CKiD study, PEW was diagnosed and categorized using 5 criteria: 1. Muscle mass (Mid arm muscle circumference);2. Body mass (body mass index);3. Biochemical parameters (serum cholesterol, serum albumin, serum transferrin, and C-reactive protein);4: Appetite and 5. Short stature. PEW was further categorized as mild (> 2 criteria), standard (> 3 criteria), and modified (> 3 criteria with short stature). Infections that needed hospitalization included viral hemorrhagic fever, COVID-19 infection, sepsis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, peritonitis, and catheter-related blood stream infection. Result(s): Among 136 children (45 on dialysis, mean age 122 + 46 months, 70% males) 72 (53%) had PEW. The proportions of those with mild, standard, and modified PEW were 8%, 13%, and 32% respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 38 + 21 months, 104 (76%) children required hospital admissions of which 69% were due to infections. Death was noted in 2%, and 12% got transplanted. The proportion of children needing hospital admissions was significantly higher in those with PEW compared to those without PEW (85% vs 66% respectively, p=0.011). IRHA was observed in 68% of children with PEW compared to 36% without PEW (p<0.001). The proportion of IRHA in those with dialysis with or without PEW ((87% vs 50%, p=0.001) was significantly higher compared to those with CKD 2-5 (54% vs 32%, p= 0.03). In the overall cohort, the proportion of IRHA was significantly higher with modified PEW compared to other PEW categories (p<0.001), [modified: 74.4%, standard: 58.0%, mild: 59%, no PEW: 36%]. On multivariable analysis, by adjusting for age, gender, etiology of CKD, and dialysis, the presence of PEW and dialysis status were independent factors associated with IRHA [Adjusted OR 3.58 (1.62,7.89), p=0.002] and [OR 3.29 (1.4,7.75), p=0.006, respectively]. Similarly, the presence of inflammation was independently associated with IRHA [OR 3.93 (1.49, 10.3), p=0.002]. Figure 1 shows the risk factors associated with IRHA based on PEW categories and inflammation status. [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): In children with CKD 2-5D, the presence of PEW and inflammation were significantly associated with IRHA. Children with modified PEW had nearly 5 times more risk of developing IRHA, reinforcing the importance of growth as a unique parameter of PEW in these children. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

Has COVID-19 affected complication rate ofIPC placements?

The COVID pandemic increased uptake of indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) as first-line management of malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions. This study reviewed the complication rate in view of this and its associated impact. Retrospective data analysis of IPCs between 2020-2021 was performed. Data collection included patient demographics, indication, treatment, and complication rate. 187 IPCs were inserted in 180 patients. Pneumothorax rate was low (1%). Common complications were incomplete drainage at point of IPC removal, IPC-related infection, and chronic pain. Despite incomplete drainage in 54 (29%) patients, only 8 required further procedures (1 IPC, 7 therapeutic aspirations). 80 patients received chemotherapy or immunotherapy. 11% developed IPC-related infection: 7% pleural infection and 4% cellulitis. 100 patients did not receive immunosuppressive treatment: 2% had pleural infection. Pleural infection occurred 8 weeks post-insertion (median 63 days) requiring 19 bed days per patient and 1 IPC removal. 2 IPCs were removed due to intractable chronic pain. Overall, complications associated with IPC in our practice were lower than recently published data. IPC-related infection is a problem;however, our study was underpowered, and the effect of immunosuppressive treatment could not be analysed. Despite this, most patients required conservative treatment only and did not require IPC removal, allowing ongoing usage of the IPC.

Health Care-Associated Infections: Best Practices for Prevention

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Common examples include catheter-associated urinary tract infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical site infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections. Standardized infection control processes and precautions have been shown to reduce the rate of HAIs, and targeted practices for HAIs have shown further reductions. Patient safety tools have been developed for various HAIs to help guide administrators and are free for public use through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STRIVE (States Targeting Reduction in Infections via Engagement) initiative. The Choosing Wisely initiative makes best practice recommendations for physicians to improve quality of care and reduce costs;targeted recommendations were developed to reduce the risk of HAIs. For example, using invasive devices only when indicated and for the shortest time possible reduces the risk of device-related HAIs. The goal of antibiotic stewardship is to reduce C. difficile infections and further development of multidrug-resistant organisms such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antibiotic stewardship targets physician behaviors such as reviewing antibiotic therapy choices every 48 to 72 hours, reviewing culture results as soon as available, de-escalating antibiotic therapy when appropriate, and documenting the indications for initiating and continuing antibiotic therapy.Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Family Physicians.

Outcome of Tunneled Cuffed Catheter as Hemodialysis Access;a Single Centre Experience in a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India

Introduction: Although AVFs are preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, tunneled cuffed catheters(TCC) are increasingly being used as dialysis access in certain clinical situations such as in AVF failure or lack of suitable vessels for AVF creation or bridge to living donor transplant. Aim and objective of this study was to study the characteristics of the population having benefited from tunneled cuffed catheters, to identify the different indications as well as the complications secondary to tunneled cuffed catheters in hemodialysis patients and to determine the catheter and patient survival rate and the factors associated with complications and survival. Method(s): This was an retrospective Observational study done after institutional ethics committee approval. All data was captured using standard proforma. The data was tabulated using MS excel and all results projected in form of bar graphs, pie charts, histograms or tables. Kaplan- meier analysis was used for survival. All patients included in the study consented for the procedure as well as collection of data. 527 TCC placement were done in 498 patients by nephrologists without fluoroscopy in a percutaneous fashion between jan 2021 to march 2022. Minimum follow up was 12 months. 37 patients lost to follow up. Result(s): 316 (68.5%) were males and mean age was 48.3+/-12.6 years. Staggered tip MAHURKAR MaxidTM Covidien, was used in every patient. Most common native kidney disease was cresentic GN 176(38.1%). Most common Site of TCC was right internal jugular 88.9%(441/496), followed by left internal jugular 10.48%(52/496), femoral TCC done in 0.6%. Mean blood flow achieved was 311+/- 32ml/min. Most common indication of TCC placement was starting of HD after 1/2 temporary access- 162(32.66%), followed by awaiting Maturation of autogenous AVF 66 (13.3%) and awaiting living-related transplantation 54(10.88%). Total catheter related infective episodes (CRBSI) were 229 (1.07 episodes/1000catheter days),Exit site infection was in 57 cases (0.26 /1000 catheter days), Tunnel infection was in 51(0.19/1000 catheter days), Infective endocarditis was seen in 3 cases. Catheter loss due to CRBSI was 23 (12.16%). Most common organism was Enterococci (29.7%), followed by s.aureus (24.32%). Most common immediate complication was tunnel bleeding (5.9% ), followed by improper tip position 4.68%. Late complications due to TCC thrombosis/ fibrin sheath was 74(15.07%). Recanalisation with urokinase was successful in 36.84%. Central venous stenosis was in 26 cases. successful recanalisation after central venoplasty was 16/19 (84.21%). Mean catheter survival was 201.9 +/- 114.9 days (3day to 12 months). Catheter survival at the end of 3 months was 75.76%, at 6 months 63.4%, at 12months 32.17%. Patient survival at 6 months was 86.7%, at 12 months- 77.5%. Most common cause of death was unrelated to TCC - cardiovascular cause (77.6%). Direct TCC related death was in 5 cases. Most common cause of catheter drop out was patient death (33.03%), followed by maturation of AVF (22.82%), catheter thrombosis/fibrin sheath (22.2%). [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): Though AVF is the best access, for late unplanned HD initiation in many CKD patients, TCC insertion becomes next best option. In access crisis patients, TCC may remain one feasible option for bridge to available live donor transplant. With strict asepsis protocol and technical aptitude TCC placement is safe with few side effects. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

Relationship between nutritional status and catheter-related infection in COVID-19 patients

Introduction: Malnutrition is associated with an increased risk of infection, longer hospital stays, and increased mortality [1]. COVID-19 infection is known to require several days or even weeks in hospital care, leading patients to nutritional risk [2]. Catheter-related infection (CRI) is associated with mortality, prolonged stays, and higher hospital costs [3]. Objetive: To assess the relationship between nutritional status (mNUTRIC) and central venous catheter (CVC) infection. Method(s): In this study we included patients admitted to the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (UCI) in 2020. Two groups were formed: mNUTRIC <5 (low risk) and mNUTRIC >=5 (high risk). The mNUTRIC score (0-9 points) is based on the NUTRIC score without the inclusion of the IL-6 value. It consists of 5 variables: age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), number of comorbidities and days in the hospital before ICU admission [4]. Two groups were formed: positive blood and catheter tip cultures and the group with negative blood cultures. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to assess the relationship between nutritional status (mNUTRIC) and CVC infection. Result(s): Were admitted 51 patients to the ICU with COVID-19, and seven patients were removed from the final dataset due to lack of data. Of a total of 44, 77.3% were male, with ages ranging between 34 and 90 years, with an average of 70.3 years and a mean ICU stay was 15.05 days. With positive blood and catheter tip cultures, CRI was diagnosed in 8 patients (18.2%). There is a significant relationship between the mNUTRIC Score and CRI with chi2 = 5.5, p < .05. Discussion & conclusion: Nutritional status of COVID- 19 patients is undoubtedly related to complications and increased risk of death [5]. The relationship between high nutritional risk, present in 50% of the patients, and the presence of CRI has been statistically proven. The main recommendation after this study is that, through the mNUTRIC score, patients at risk are identified and nutritional intervention and CRI prevention strategies can be implemented early.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) by Race and Ethnicity in a Large Network of Community Hospitals: A Call to Action

Background. Inequities in healthcare among racial and ethnic minorities are globally recognized. The focus has centered on access to healthcare, equitable treatment, and optimizing outcomes. However, there has been relatively little investigation into potential racial and ethnic disparities in HAI. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of select HAI prospectively-collected by a network of community hospitals in the southeastern US, including central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheterassociated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and laboratory-identified Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Outcomes were stratified by race/ethnicity as captured in the electronic medical record. We defined the pre-pandemic period from 1/1/2019 to 2/29/2020 and the pandemic period from 3/1/2020 to 6/30/2021. Outcomes were reported by race/ethnicity as a proportion of the total events. Relative rates were compared using Poisson regression. Results. Overall, relatively few facilities consistently collect race/ethnicity information in surveillance databases within this hospital network (< 40%). Among 21 reporting hospitals, a greater proportion of CLABSI occurred in Black patients relative toWhite patients in both study periods (pre-pandemic, 49% vs 38%;during pandemic, 47% vs 31%;respectively, Figure 1a), while a higher proportion of CAUTI and CDI occurred in White patients (Figures 1b-c). Black patients had a 30% higher likelihood of CLABSI than White patients in the pre-COVID period (RR, 1.30;95% CI, 0.83-2.05), which was not statistically significant (Table 1). However, this risk significantly increased to 51% after the start of the pandemic (RR, 1.51;95% CI, 1.02-2.24). Similar trends were not observed in other HAI (Tables 2-3). Conclusion. We found differences in HAI rates by race/ethnicity in a network of community hospitals. Black patients had higher likelihood of CLABSI, and this likelihood increased during the pandemic. Patient safety events, including HAI, may differ across racial and ethnic groups and negatively impact health outcomes. (Figure Presented).

Risk factors for a Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection Amongst Hospitalized Patients with COVID

Background. Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are serious healthcare associated infections. During the COVID pandemic, we observed an increased incidence of CLABSIs in our healthcare system. We sought to identify risk factors for CLABSI among patients with COVID. Methods. We performed a single-center, matched case-control study in patients admitted between Mar 2020 and Dec 2020 who were 1) diagnosed with COVID based on laboratory results or diagnosis code, and who were 2) at risk for developing a CLABSI based on the presence of a central line for >=3 days. Cases were those diagnosed, based on National Healthcare Safety Network criteria, with CLABSI;controls were patients not diagnosed with CLABSI. Cases and controls were 1:4 matched based on age at admission (+/- 5 years) and COVID diagnosis date (+/- 45 days). Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous and categorical variables. For comparisons, p values are from generalized estimating equations accounting for clustering by casecontrol matches. All analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Approval was granted by our institutional IRB. Results. Characteristics of the patients who were diagnosed with COVID and at risk for developing a CLABSI are presented in table 1. Compared to patients with COVID and no CLABSI, patients with a CLABSI were more likely to be of a non-white race (p=0.0435). A longer length of stay was observed among CLABSI patients, (p=0.0011) and patients with CLABSI were less likely to be discharged to home (p=0.0084). There was a non-statistically significant trend toward a history of diabetes (p=0.0554), receipt of corticosteroids (p=0.052) and receipt of tocilizumab (p=0.0952) among CLABSI patients. Conclusion. Patients hospitalized for COVID who developed a CLABSI had longer hospitalizations and were less likely to be discharged home. Race other than white was a risk factor for CLABSI among patients with COVID. The relationships between race, racism, and CLABSI should be further explored. (Table Presented).

Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs): Expanding Analysis to the Microbiologic Level

Background. Increases in central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates have been reported in association with the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among Candida species and coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species (CoNS). We sought to further validate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CLABSI trends and perform a microbiologic analysis. Methods. This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of CLABSIs across a network of 38 community hospitals in southeastern United States. CLABSI rates were compared between pre-pandemic (1/1/2018-3/30/2020) and pandemic periods (4/1/2020-12/31/2021). Regression models were developed to evaluate CLABSI incidence over time. Likelihood ratio tests were used to compare models that were exclusively time-dependent to segmented regression models that also accounted for the COVID-19 pandemic. Results. A total of 1,167 CLABSIs over 1,345,062 central line days were analyzed (Table 1). The mean monthly CLABSI rate per hospital increased from 0.63 to 1.01 per 1,000 central line days (p< 0.001) in the pandemic period (Table 1). CLABSIs secondary to Candida (0.16 to 0.33, p< 0.001), CoNS (0.09 to 0.22, p< 0.001), and Enterococcal species (0.06 to 0.18, p=0.001) increased, while Escherichia coli CLABSIs decreased (0.04 to 0.01, p< 0.001). Upon regression modeling, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increases in monthly CLABSI rates by Candida and Enterococcus species (Figure 1). In contrast, the changes in CoNS and Escherichia coli CLABSI rates were better explained by exclusively timedependent models (Figure 1;Table 2). Non-sustained changes in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae CLABSI rates were also noted (Table 2). Gray areas denote COVID-19 pandemic period. Statistically significant level changes in CLABSI rates were observed among Candida and Enterococcus spp. (RR=1.92, CI 1.16-3.20 and 2.42, CI 1.09-5.38). Staphylococcus aureus CLABSI rates had a non-sustained but significant increase at the onset of COVID-19 (RR 2.20, CI 1.16-4.20). CoNS and E. coli rate changes occurred independent of COVID-19 (see Table 2). Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial increases in CLABSIs, driven in part by Candida and Enterococcus species across this network of hospitals. However, the observed increase in CoNS CLABSIs and decrease in Escherichia coli CLABSIs appear to have occurred independently of COVID-19, which only became apparent upon regression analysis. Interpretation of pre-post statistics without assessment of pre-existing trends should be done cautiously. Additional analyses may help elucidate other factors influencing these CLABSI trends by organism.

Comparison of Trends in Hospital-Onset Bloodstream Infections (HOBSIs) and Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) across a Three-Hospital Health System in the COVID Era

Background. Hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HOBSI) incidence has been proposed as a complementary quality metric to central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) surveillance. Several recent studies have detailed increases in median HOBSI and CLABSI rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand trends in HOBSI and CLABSI rates at a single health system in the context of COVID-19. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of HOBSIs and CLABSIs at a three-hospital health system from 2017 to 2021 (Figure 1). We compared counts, denominators, and demographic data for HOBSIs and CLABSIs between the prepandemic (1/1/2017-3/30/2020) and pandemic period (4/1/2020-12/31/2021) (Table 1). We applied Poisson or negative binomial regression models to estimate the monthly change in incidence of HO-BSI and CLABSI rates over the study period. Figure 1: Definitions applied for hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Potentially contaminated blood cultures were identified by microbiology laboratory technicians as any set of blood culture in which a single bottle was positive for organisms typically considered as skin contaminants. Uncertain cases undergo secondary review by senior lab technicians. Table 1: Count, denominator, and device utilization ratio data for hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HO-BSIs) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) Note that central line utilization increased upon regression analysis (p<0.001). Results. The median monthly HOBSI rate per 1,000 patient days increased from 1.0 in the pre-pandemic to 1.3 (p< 0.01) in the pandemic period, whereas the median monthly CLABSI rate per central line days was stable (1.01 to 0.88;p=0.1;Table 2). Our regression analysis found that monthly rates of HO-BSIs increased throughout the study, but the increase was not associated with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic based on comparisons of model fit (Figure 2;Table 3). Despite an increase in central line utilization, regression modelling found no changes in monthly CLABSIs rates with respect to time and the COVID-19 pandemic. Incidence of HOBSIs and CLABSIs by common nosocomial organisms generally increased over this time period, though time to infection onset remained unchanged in our studied population (Table 2). Conclusion. HOBSIs rates did not correlate with CLABSI incidence across a three-hospital health system from 2017 and 2021, as rates of HOBSI increased but CLABSI rates remained flat. Our observed increase in HOBSI rates did not correlate with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and caution should be used in modeling the effects of COVID-19 without time-trended analysis. Further evaluation is needed to understand the etiology, epidemiology, and preventability of HO-BSI.

Comparison of California Acute Care Hospital Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Incidence by Hospital Location Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) incidence among acute care hospitals (ACH) and in some patient care locations such as critical care (CC) units increased substantially nationwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared California ACH CLABSI incidence by location before and during the pandemic to identify locations with high burden to inform targeted prevention efforts. Methods. Using California ACH (n=327) CLABSI standardized infection ratio (SIR) data fromthe NationalHealthcare Safety Network, we compared incidence during the second halves of 2019 (2019H2) and2020 (2020H2) to evaluate early pandemic changes, and during 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 (pandemic) periods by hospital type, location type (e.g., CC), and patient care location (e.g., medical CC), excluding rehabilitation units. A mid-P exact test was applied to compare SIRs between study periods. Results. ACH CLABSI SIR increased statewide from 2019H2 to 2020H2 by 50.8% (0.65 to 0.98) and from 2019 to 2021 by 34.3% (0.67 to 0.90). Community hospitals < 125 beds had the highest SIR and percentage increase in 2021 as well as 2020H2. Of 9 location types and 58 patient care locations, CC units and medical and medical-surgical CC had significantly higher SIR in both comparisons (2020H2 versus 2019H2 and 2021 versus 2019);wards and medical wards in 2020H2 only, and step-down units and adult step-down in 2021 only. Trauma CC SIR was significantly higher only in 2020H2 compared to 2019H2, while surgical CC SIR was significantly higher in 2021 compared to 2019. Respiratory CC had the highest SIR (2.99, 95%CI 2.14-4.08) in 2021, but was not significantly higher when compared to 2019 (1.06, 95%CI 0.21-3.41). Conclusion. We observed an overall statewide increase in hospital CLABSI incidence, especially in CC locations, during the pandemic. Although the SIR increase relative to pre-pandemic was smaller in 2021 than in 2020H2, with some exceptions, most locations had persistently higher incidence. We will further assess associations between CLABSI incidence and antimicrobial resistance, device insertion dates, and hospital COVID-19 burden. We will use our findings to guide public health support for hospital infection prevention programs to reduce their CLABSI incidence.

CLABSIs in the Time of COVID

Background. With the COVID-19 pandemic, acute care facilities experienced an initial increase in hospital-acquired infections, most notably Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs). Interestingly, the positive correlation between COVID-19 and CLABSIs appeared to wane post surge. We sought to define the pre and post-pandemic CLABSI rates. Methods. Single-center, retrospective review of the CLABSIs reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) for the five years previous to COVID and through to the First Quarter of 2022. Our center is a quaternary care, level 1 trauma center in New York, which serves a highly ill critical care population, including solid organ and bone marrow transplants, acute leukemias, and patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Results. Between January 2015 and December 2019, our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) reported 15 CLABSIs with an overall Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) of 1.007. During the second winter surge of COVID, we saw a sharp rise in CLABSIs. Between October 2020 and March 2021, our MICU reported eight CLABSIs, with an overall SIR of 4.601 and a p-value of 0.0005 (CI 2.137 - 8.737), representing a statistically significant increase (p-value 0.0019) in comparison to prior years. Of these patients, seven had COVID. All patients received high-dose steroids. The average number of days between hospital admission to CLABSI was 16.38 days, and mortality was 87.5%. Since that spike in CLABSI, we have reported seven CLABSIs in NHSN for a SIR of 2.026. After 2019 patients with CLABSI tended to be younger and had a higher Body Mass Index. Conclusion. We reported a spike in CLABSIs in our adult medical Intensive Care during the second wave of COVID-19 that affected the Northeast United States in the winter of 2020/2021. Despite experiencing a sharp rise, our CLABSI rates are returning to pre-pandemic low levels even during subsequent surges in COVID-19, including the recent Omicron surge. It remains to be determined if the improvements in infection control measures, differences in the patient illness severity, and/or variations of COVID management have contributed to the stabilization of the CLABSI rate.

Central Line - Associated Bloodstream Infections and Their Increase With the COVID-19 Pandemic at Veterans Affairs in San Antonio, Texas

Background. Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increase in healthcare-associated infections (HAI). This increase is likely multifactorial (i.e. higher hospitalization rates, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 complications, lower staffing, delayed care among others). The objective of this study was to determine the association between COVID-19 hospitalization rates and central line- associated blood stream infections (CLABSI). Methods. We conducted a retrospective study in acute care unit hospitalizations in a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital in San Antonio, Texas from October 2017 to December 2021. Individuals over 18 years of age admitted with a new diagnosis of COVID-19, determined by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were included in the study. CLABSIs were defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria for laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections. Pearson correlation was used to determine correlation of CLABSI and COVID-19 disease hospitalization rates. CLABSI rates were also compared pre-COVID-19 (Oct 2017-Feb 2020) to COVID-19 (Mar 2020-Dec 2021) periods using the chi-square test. Results. During the study period, a total of 0.69 CLABSIs per 1,000 central line days occurred in the pre-COVID-19 period compared to 1.98 per 1,000 in the COVID-19 period (p=0.004). There was a significant correlation between CLABSI and ICU COVID-19 hospitalization rates (R=0.459;p=0.001) as well as CLABSI and acute care COVID-19 hospitalization rates (R=0.341;p=0.014). During the COVID-19 period only, there continued to be a significant correlation between CLABSI and COVID-19 ICU hospitalization rates (R=0.426;p=0.048). Conclusion. CLABSI rates significantly increased during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period and CLABSI rates were significantly correlated with COVID-19 ICU and acute care hospitalizations. Accounting for this variable allows us to factor in impact of post-COVID-19 related complications and association with CLABSI rate. We urge for careful implementation of HAI prevention strategies during the pandemic. Awareness of anticipated increase is important in allocating resources essential for prevention of HAIs.

Impact of a Midline Catheter Prioritization Project on Central Venous Access and Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections at an Urban Safety-net Community Hospital

Background. The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has increased in the past decade. PICCs are central lines (CLs) commonly used for venous access. Midline catheters (MLs) can provide access when the need for a CL, such as vasopressors, is no longer present. MLs have a lower rate of BSI compared to PICCs and CLs, while providing dwell times comparable to PICCs. We established a project prioritizing ML use. Methods. This is a quasi-experimental study in a 151-bed safety net community hospital. The pre-intervention period was January-December 2018 and post period was January 2019-December 2021. MLs were prioritized when new PICCs are requested without CL indications, such as total parenteral nutrition, hyperosmolar solutions and vasopressors. PICCs and CLs are transitioned to a ML once indications are no longer met and peripheral IVs are not feasible. Data on utilization and complications, such as deep venous thrombus (DVT) and BSIs, were reviewed and compared. Results. A total of 63 peripherally inserted lines occurred prior to the intervention, of which 55 (87%) were PICC and 8 (13%) were ML (Figure 1). Post-intervention, 76 lines were placed the first year, of which 48 wereML (63%). This upward trend was sustained throughout the pandemic, with 116 lines in 2020 (80%ML) and 96 in 2021 (88% ML). No BSIs occurred during the pre-intervention and first post-intervention year. During the pandemic, 8 BSIs in MLs and 3 in PICCs occurred. The most common organismwas Candida (Figure 2). Themajority had COVID-19 (72%) and all (100%) BSIs were in the setting of shock. Case review demonstrated suspected secondary sources other than central venous catheters (CVCs). All BSIs with ML would have met NHSN criteria if CL present. No upper extremity DVTs were found. Conclusion. A midline prioritization project was successfully implemented and sustained during the COVID-19 pandemic. The decline of PICC use from 87% to 12% suggests use for access without CL needs. High acuity during the pandemic led to BSIs that were likely secondary to shock and complications of COVID-19. All cases would have met NHSN criteria for CLABSI. The cost of a CLABSI is estimated at $48,108. (Figure Presented).

II International Conference on Vascular Access, CIAV 2022

The proceedings contain 13 papers. The topics discussed include: are citizens involved in vascular access research? a scoping review protocol;nursing care to prevent peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related complications: a systematic review;clothing constraints in maintaining vascular access;supporting Portuguese nurses' evidence-based practice related to peripheral intravenous catheterization: a Delphi consensus study;aseptic techniques for peripherally inserted central catheters: a scoping review protocol;unusual placement of a fully implantable catheter into the internal thoracic vein;relationship between nutritional status and catheter-related infection in COVID-19 patients;comparison of two methods for evaluation of the tip position in totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD);and best practice in the insertion and maintenance of removal of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC): contributions to nursing care.

RISK OF CANNULA-SITE INFECTION FOR BEDSIDE PERCUTANEOUS CANNULATIONS PERFORMED BY INTENSIVISTS: A RETROSPECTIVE, SINGLE-INSTITUTION CASE SERIES

SESSION TITLE: Not the Normal Host: Infections Still Matter SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Original Inv PRESENTED ON: 10/17/2022 12:15 pm - 1:15 pm PURPOSE: Utilization of ECMO support for refractory cardiogenic, and respiratory failure has increased exponentially over the last 20 years. The advent of miniaturized and portable machines has led to a shift of cannulation strategies in the operating room/cath lab to the bedside. Transitioning to bedside cannulation has been previously reported as safe, with minimal risk for mortality or catheter site infections. However, bedside cannulations in the critically ill crashing patient raises concern for sterility. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of ECMO cannula site infections in bedside vs operating room/catheterization suite. METHODS: It is a retrospective single institution case series review of 52 adult and pediatric patients who were required either Veno-Venous (VV) or Veno-Arterial (VA) ECMO. Data gathering was used to quantify the rate of catheter site infections after initiation of extracorporeal support. Catheter site infections were defined as localized erythema, fluctuance, or purulence from the cannula site within 7 days of of ECMO cannula placement. RESULTS: A total of 42 (81%) pts had bedside cannulation, and the other 10 (19%), were done in IR suite/cath lab. The total number of catheter site infections was 1 (2.4%) in the bedside cannulation group. There were no infections in the non-bedside cannulation groups. 13 (30%) of the bedside cannulations, and 3 (30%) of the non-bedside cannulation group were on antibiotics during or prior to cannula insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests that the prevalence of infections on ECMO is 10-12%,. Traditionally, this has predisposed most cannulations to be performed in the surgical setting rather than at bedside. During the recent COVID pandemic, the frequency of bedside cannulation for ECMO had increased and was not associated with significant morbidity, and mortality. The risk of infection from the catheter site had also been determined to be minimal to none. From the data gathered above, it can be safely assumed that the risk of catheter site infection with bedside cannulation is minimal. However, the major contributing factor to decreased infection risk appears to be meticulous cannula site nursing care. The current ECMO nursing protocol utilized at our hospital required twice daily dressing changes with stringent chlorhexidine cleanses prior to redressing. The only case of catheter site infection we experienced was when this protocol was deviated. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Utilizations of bedside ECMO cannulation techniques carries minimal risk for catheter site infections. It is important to state that nursing driven protocols for cannula site dressing changes, has one of the biggest implications on the risk of catheter site infections. Therefore, with the employment of appropriate nursing protocols, the concern for catheter site infections should not preclude the decision to proceed with bedside cannulation. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Ajit Alexander No relevant relationships by Melodie Blackmon Scientific Medical Advisor relationship with ALung Technologies, Inc. Please note: $5001 - $20000 by Steven Conrad, value=Consulting fee No relevant relationships by ANIBAL DOMINGUEZ no disclosure on file for Jonathan Eaton;No relevant relationships by Laurie Grier No relevant relationships by Rajkamal Hansra No relevant relationships by Prathik Krishnan No relevant relationships by Nathaniel LSUHSC-Shreveport No relevant relationships by Alex Manuel No relevant relationships by Jonathan Packer No relevant relationships by arunima sharma no disclosure on file for Chris Trosclair;No relevant relationships by Gregory Vo No relevant relationships by Robert Walter

Does Frequency of in-Person Clinic Evaluation Impact Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients

Background: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is the primary treatment for patients with pediatric intestinal failure. It is a complex, life-sustaining therapy requiring a central venous catheter (CVC), and carries high morbidity. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a common and potentially fatal complication of HPN. Patients on HPN require a skilled multi-disciplinary team- including physicians, nurses, dietitians and pharmacists-to prevent HPN related complications, provide safe and individualized nutrition support that is evaluated on a regular basis in the ambulatory setting. In-person visits in the clinic setting allow for HPN patients to be evaluated by all disciplines, and full assessment of weight and general condition, fluid status and laboratory values. Importantly, clinic evaluations also allow for close examination of central venous catheter (CVC), discussion with caregivers to identify potential infection risks, and opportunities for education to prevent infections and other complications. Program standard of care is bimonthly clinic and laboratory evaluation, more frequently if clinically indicated. The COVID-19 crisis required transition of many of these evaluations from in-person to telemedicine, which has created new challenges in caring for high-risk pediatric HPN patients and prevention of CLABSI. Multi-disciplinary telemedicine visits including nursing, dietitians and physicians were substituted for in-person evaluations at first exclusively at onset of pandemic, then to every other visit as COVID rates improved and vaccinations became more available. Method(s): HPN clinic encounters from 2019-present were reviewed in a large pediatric HPN program and compared to CLABSI rates. Attention was paid to in-person versus telemedicine evaluations in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. CLABSI rate was defined as # of ambulatory infections/1000 catheter days, as defined by National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) guidelines. Result(s): Despite decreased frequency of in-person clinic evaluation, ambulatory CLABSI rates did not increase during this time. In fact, median CLABSI rate from 2020 to present decreased from 0.81/1000 catheter days to 0.5/1000 catheter days. In 2020, there was a mild trend toward increased CLABSI rate in patients who had higher percentage of telemedicine versus in-person encounters;however, this was not statistically significant. This trend was not observed in 2021. Conclusion(s): Pediatric patients receiving HPN are high-risk and require evaluation by a multidisciplinary team at regular intervals to maintain safety. COVID-19 pandemic interrupted ability to see these complex patients for in-person evaluation with regular frequency;therefore multidisciplinary telemedicine visits were substituted. While in-person evaluation remains the gold standard for management of patients on HPN, intermittent use of multi-disciplinary telemedicine encounters can be utilized to safely care for pediatric HPN patients, without resultant (Figure Presented).